“Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.”
– Often attributed to Albert Einstein, frequently repeated by wise CFOs everywhere.
In a well-run company, key metrics should tell a clear story. They should pulse like a heart monitor—not merely recording activity, but signaling health. Yet walk into any operating review or board meeting, and you’ll find yourself drowning in a sea of dashboards, trending arrows, heat maps, and color-coded KPIs. The modern CFO doesn’t suffer from a lack of data—they suffer from an overabundance of it. The real challenge is not generating more numbers, but having the discipline to choose fewer—ones that matter, tell the truth, and drive action.
The best finance leaders are not scorekeepers—they are story curators. They know that metrics aren’t just there to measure performance; they shape it. People respond to what’s tracked. Teams compete to improve what’s visible. What gets measured gets managed, yes—but only if what’s measured is meaningful.
The real risk is subtle: confusing the ease of measurement with the importance of the thing being measured. Just because it can be counted doesn’t mean it has consequence. Page views are easy to measure, but they rarely drive business value. EBITDA is frequently misused as a proxy for value creation. Sales activity metrics are seductive, but without conversion, they mean little. We live in a world where analytics tools have made every click, swipe, dollar, and decision trackable. But we’ve rarely stopped to ask: which numbers actually move the business?
So the CFO’s job—perhaps the most strategic part of it—is to be the Chief Editor of Metrics. Not to flood the organization with data, but to extract the few signals that matter from the noise.
That work begins with an essential question: What is the business solving for?
If that question is unclear, the metrics will always be muddled. A company solving for speed needs different KPIs than one optimizing for quality. A business focused on customer trust cannot rely solely on short-term revenue per rep. A company trying to build long-term embeddedness can’t simply chase top-of-funnel metrics.
The CFO’s job is to help the business get honest about goals—and then identify the metrics that reflect whether those goals are being achieved. Not just on a lagging basis (revenue, EBITDA, net income), but on a leading basis—what tells us we’re moving in the right direction, before the quarter ends and the P&L is final?
A useful framework here is to separate metrics into three layers:
- Directional Metrics – These are leading indicators that shape strategic movement. They are often behavioral: product adoption curves, usage intensity, retention cohorts, sales velocity, time to onboarding. They don’t prove success, but they suggest its trajectory.
- Control Metrics – These are the operational checkpoints. Things like gross margin, working capital turns, headcount productivity. They help you assess whether the machine is operating within expected tolerances.
- Outcome Metrics – These are the final measures: net revenue, cash flow, profitability. They’re necessary, but they are by definition lagging. They tell you what happened, not what’s happening.
Great CFOs work across all three levels—but they don’t treat them as equal. They weight them by business context and adjust them as the business evolves. A pre-product-market fit company should obsess over customer feedback velocity and churn. A Series C SaaS company should be closely watching CAC payback and expansion efficiency. A mature business with solid recurring revenue might care more about operating leverage and free cash flow conversion.
And yet, too often, we find the same stale KPIs recycled from company to company: bookings, pipeline coverage, NRR, burn multiple, contribution margin. These are all useful—if they are curated. But when everything is tracked, nothing stands out. When ten metrics light up red, no one knows where to look. And when KPIs become wallpaper, they lose their bite.
This is where a strategic CFO must draw the line. Choose no more than ten KPIs that sit at the top of the house—ones that can be clearly explained, owned by functions, and tied to incentive design. They should be:
- Aligned with strategy
- Influenceable by action
- Measurable with consistency
- Communicated frequently
- Tracked with discipline
More importantly, each KPI should have a defined relationship to a strategic question. Not a number for its own sake, but an answer to something that matters. For example:
- Are we monetizing efficiently? ? Look at CAC payback, not just top-line growth.
- Are we delighting customers? ? Use NPS, yes, but pair it with renewal velocity and support resolution times.
- Are we building a durable revenue base? ? NRR and gross revenue retention must be decoupled and studied independently.
- Are we allocating capital with rigor? ? Look at ROI on growth projects—not just spend levels, but return curves.
Even more powerful is when the CFO creates metric narratives—a brief weekly or monthly insight that weaves numbers into meaning. Not just “ARR grew 8%,” but “Expansion slowed in the enterprise segment while SMB drove net-new logos. This suggests product-led motion is gaining traction, but upsell sequencing needs review.” That’s not reporting. That’s interpretation. That’s leadership.
One trick I’ve found invaluable is tracking a few anti-metrics—signals that suggest unhealthy optimization. Things like:
- Sudden dips in discount rate without corresponding revenue improvement.
- Sales quota attainment masking deteriorating deal quality.
- Headcount growth with flat productivity.
- High NPS paired with rising churn (suggesting politeness, not passion).
These are canaries in the coal mine. They warn when the system is gaming itself. And they’re a key part of curating metrics that drive truth, not theater.
Now, what about metrics in boardrooms? Many CFOs feel pressure to present a dazzling array of metrics to impress investors. Resist that instinct. Boards don’t want more numbers. They want fewer that matter. They want to see the strategic flywheel—and how you’re measuring its rotation.
In a recent review, I remember seeing 72 metrics in a board packet. The board stopped after page ten. Not because they were lazy—but because the key issues were already clear. Growth was slowing. Churn had crept up. Margins had dipped. The board wanted to understand why—not sift through vanity metrics. The CFO who can narrate these core metrics with strategic coherence earns trust far faster than one who dazzles with metrics that don’t tell a unified story.
Lastly, there’s one measure every CFO should track, though it rarely shows up in a dashboard: Metric Decay.
That is, how often do your KPIs need to change? Are you measuring what mattered last year—or what matters now? Do your current metrics reflect this phase of the market, this phase of your company, this customer behavior? Or are you chasing ghosts of relevance?
The best KPI curation is living. Not ad hoc, but not static. It is reviewed quarterly. It is aligned with executive incentives. It is embedded into OKRs. And when a metric stops being predictive or actionable, it is retired—gracefully and publicly.
So as you think about curating KPIs this year, remember: you are not trying to build a prettier dashboard. You are trying to create strategic alignment. Your job is not to measure everything. It’s to shine a spotlight on what really matters—so that when the pressure comes, the business knows what levers to pull and what stories to trust.
In a world flooded with metrics, the rarest and most valuable act is curation.
That is the CFO’s opportunity: not to count more things, but to count the right things—and to turn that clarity into conviction.
Ask ChatGPT
Discover more from Insightful CFO
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
