Building Trust: Key Signals for Insurers

Part I: Behavior as the Balance Sheet

I first learned that insurance underwriting goes beyond the application when an underwriter told me, without irony, that email tone shapes risk appetite. At the time, it seemed anecdotal. Over time, it proved predictive. Underwriters do not only assess financial statements and coverage limits. They evaluate behavior—specifically, how founders govern, communicate, and execute when no one is watching. In my thirty years navigating finance, risk, and uncertainty, I’ve come to see underwriting not as a cold technical exercise, but as a behavioral mirror. Insurers do not price documents. They price how leadership teams behave under pressure.

Startups operate in a fog of execution. Capital is constrained. Talent is fluid. Time compresses. Decisions compound. In that environment, insurers seek proxies that signal trustworthiness before the claim hits. That’s where governance rhythm, cyber hygiene, compliance cadence, and yes, even email tone, become decision levers. Each signal offers clues about how a team makes decisions. And when those signals align, insurers underwrite confidence. When they do not, they underwrite caution.

Many founders view insurance like a fire extinguisher: something you buy and forget. But insurers know better. They underwrite behavior—not because they distrust founders, but because they have seen what happens when no one prepares. And in my experience, the founders who understand this behavioral lens outperform their peers—not just on premiums, but on board trust, capital access, and operational resilience.

Governance: Rhythm Over Bureaucracy

Underwriters begin with governance because it reflects how a team makes decisions. They do not require a public-company board structure. What they want is rhythm. When do you meet? Who attends? Do you document outcomes? Do you review risk regularly? These aren’t formalities. They are signals of order.

Years ago, I worked with a firm preparing for a multi-line renewal. The founder presented immaculate projections. But when asked about governance cadence, he paused. No board minutes. No operating committee. No risk logs. That silence said more than the spreadsheets. To the underwriter, it suggested opacity. Not malice—just disorganization. That uncertainty widened the margin for error. It also widened the quote.

Founders sometimes dismiss governance as unnecessary overhead. But rhythm isn’t about bureaucracy. It’s about muscle memory. A monthly board digest. A quarterly governance checklist. A risk register. These practices cost little but carry weight. Underwriters treat them as evidence. They don’t want to see perfect structure. They want to see continuity. And continuity suggests discipline.

Insurers have no interest in replacing management judgment. They simply want to know that judgment exists—and that it operates consistently, even in ambiguity.

Cyber Hygiene: Control in the Code

Cyber hygiene has become the new actuarial table. No area exposes a company faster. And no policy becomes obsolete quicker if hygiene degrades. Insurers understand this. So instead of relying solely on third-party audits, they increasingly ask how security is lived inside the organization.

A founder may say they encrypt data and use multi-factor authentication. But insurers probe deeper. Who owns security? When was the last phishing simulation? What is the incident escalation path? Do you review third-party data access quarterly? Can you show logs from the last patch cycle? These questions reveal whether cybersecurity is a checklist or a lived discipline.

I’ve seen startups stumble during underwriting not because they were breached, but because they lacked clarity. Their privacy policies were outdated. Their CTO had never read the cyber policy. Their staff had not received training since onboarding. These are not red flags of failure. They are red flags of fragility.

Cybersecurity, at its core, is about information entropy. The more entropy, the more uncertainty. And insurers penalize uncertainty—not because they fear breaches, but because they fear delayed detection, chaotic response, and legal blowback.

Founders who frame cybersecurity as an operating discipline, not an IT cost, earn better coverage and more trust. Because when entropy rises, structure—not optimism—determines survival.

Compliance Cadence: The Rhythm of Responsibility

Compliance often feels peripheral to startups. Most founders believe in doing the right thing. But belief is not enough. Cadence matters. How often do you revisit your employee handbook? Do you track mandatory training completions? Do you review policy updates during role transitions? These steps reflect whether risk management lives in process—or in theory.

Insurers do not demand perfection. They demand predictability. Compliance cadence becomes the clock speed of behavioral governance. A company that updates policies annually, trains staff regularly, and documents process improvements sends a clear message: we don’t just respond—we prepare.

This cadence reveals more than policy compliance. It reflects cultural maturity. A company that regularly re-examines its standards shows humility. It invites feedback. It learns from mistakes. And it reduces tail risk.

Insurers notice. So do boards. In one case, a firm I advised showed its underwriter a policy version log with timestamps. Each change reflected a real-world incident or regulation. That transparency didn’t eliminate risk. But it reframed it. The insurer saw a company that evolved, not reacted.

In my experience, insurance pricing does not reward optimism. It rewards maintenance. Maintenance of trust. Maintenance of process. Maintenance of culture.

Tone and Tempo: The Language of Risk

The most subtle—and misunderstood—signal insurers evaluate is communication tone. They notice how founders write, how fast they respond, and how clearly they explain. These are not trivial. They shape underwriters’ perception of the team’s emotional governance.

Emails matter. Not because insurers judge grammar, but because they assess tone for signs of deflection, delay, or disorganization. A founder who replies promptly, with clarity and humility, earns more latitude. A founder who replies defensively, vaguely, or erratically invites scrutiny.

I’ve seen underwriters flag accounts as high-friction not because of incidents, but because of tone. That friction adds drag to claims processing. It narrows policy terms. It slows renewals.

Tone shapes trust. And trust reduces volatility. Insurers will work with imperfect systems. They struggle with erratic behavior. Founders must realize: every email during diligence contributes to the underwriting file—even if it’s informal.

So write with the same discipline you expect from your team. Not because you want to impress, but because you want to signal: we take risk seriously, and we communicate like stewards.

---

Part II: Signaling Trust, Reducing Friction

Reverse-Engineering the Underwriter’s Mind

Once you understand that insurers underwrite behavior, not just data, you can begin reverse-engineering their lens. That means reframing your internal systems to project clarity. Not as performance. But as practice.

You start with documentation. Retain board minutes. Record security trainings. Save versioned policies. Maintain a risk log—even if brief. Each artifact becomes a proof point.

Then, align process ownership. Your CTO should manage cyber hygiene. Your legal team should own employment practices. Finance should coordinate renewals and claims preparedness. This distribution reduces ambiguity. It also shows insurers that the company isn’t running on founder intuition alone.

Next, inject rhythm. Make risk reviews a quarterly agenda item. Conduct annual policy updates—even if the law hasn’t changed. Hold mock incident walk-throughs. These rituals cost less than a single legal hour. But they return leverage.

The most successful founders I’ve worked with don’t chase perfection. They showcase process. They give insurers a story worth underwriting—one of foresight, responsibility, and systems.

Building Behavioral Advantage

Underwriting bias is real. But it can work in your favor. Insurers remember companies that communicate early, disclose risks clearly, and follow through. That memory shows up at renewal. In pricing. In leniency. In claims handling.

One founder I advised included a proactive risk update in her quarterly insurance review. It showed a new product rollout and a brief compliance gap they had already corrected. That note earned her praise—not penalty. The underwriter said, “Most companies wait until something breaks. You told us before it did.”

That is behavior as strategy. It builds goodwill before the storm. And when the storm comes, insurers lean in, not away.

This mirrors what we know from search theory and decision science. Information sent early, with clarity and context, reduces reaction cost. That applies not just to code bases or hiring, but to insurance. And to trust.

Insurance as a Relationship Asset

Too many founders treat insurers as transactional vendors. They price shop annually and disappear post-renewal. That mindset destroys continuity and invites skepticism. It also blinds leadership to the long-term value of underwriting relationships.

Think of your insurer like a credit partner. Their job is to deploy capital under asymmetric risk. The more they know you, the more flexibly they act. That flexibility shows up when you file a claim. When you restructure. When you expand abroad. If you’ve built a track record of clarity, your insurer moves fast. If you haven’t, they hesitate.

Founders should schedule a post-renewal debrief each year. Ask what drove pricing. Ask what behaviors stood out—good and bad. Ask what would make the next renewal easier. This is not groveling. It is alignment. And it pays.

In one case, a founder’s candid disclosure of a minor HR incident built so much credibility that their insurer waived an exclusion in the next policy cycle. Not because they had to. But because they trusted the team.

The Real Cost of Poor Signaling

When behavior doesn’t match expectations, the penalties compound. Coverage shrinks. Retentions rise. Premiums spike. Claims stall. And founders lose valuable time rebuilding trust.

These are not hypothetical costs. They materialize in real dollars and real legal exposure. A founder who ignores an underwriter’s process doesn’t just risk a higher quote. They risk a declined claim. And in my experience, there is no line item more expensive than an unpaid claim.

Behavioral misalignment may also spook investors. Boards ask if the company has credible insurance. If the answer is “Technically, yes,” the follow-up becomes uncomfortable. Founders who manage insurance like a strategic asset rarely face that moment. They show receipts. They control the narrative.

Closing the Loop

Insurers do not expect you to be perfect. They expect you to be predictable. They want signs that you prepare, adapt, and disclose. They want signals that your culture reflects risk maturity—not just product speed.

In that sense, the application doesn’t live in the form. It lives in the systems you build, the tone you use, and the cadence you keep. Insurers underwrite behavior because behavior predicts resilience. And resilience, more than anything, determines who survives, who recovers, and who earns optionality.

So write the application early. Every day. In every system. In every decision. Because the best time to signal trust is before you need to.